Talk:California State Route 188/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 17:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
~~See comment section below.~~Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference number 1 is not working. Fix it or delete it. I will pass the article once this issue is resolved. Everything else in the article is good.--Dom497 (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed; we can thank Microsoft for making a new XLSX format. :/ --Rs chen 7754 17:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be on hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]