Talk:California State Route 244/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 23:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • There should not be bolding in the history section.
    • "(That part of I-80 was Interstate 880 until 1981.)" should not be in parentheses.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Reference 1 is a SPS and should be replaced.
    • Citation needed for "(That part of I-80 was Interstate 880 until 1981.)"
    • References 1 and 2 need publishers and accessdates and references 5, 6, and 7 need accessdates.
    • Done except for reference 1. --Rschen7754 03:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reference 4 is a dead link.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • Can Legislative Route 288 be mentioned in the lead and bolded?
    • Can some details about the physical surroundings be added to the route description?
    • Not done, and will not be done. --Rschen7754 03:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • When was SR 244 built? This is not clearly mentioned in the history.
    • That's what the bridge dates are for... --Rschen7754 02:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I would suggest rewording "The bridges along the route date from 1971, a year after the bridges on I-80 to the west" to "SR 244 was built in 1971, a year after the portion of I-80 to the west. Dough4872 03:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still no; that misrepresents the source. Theoretically, the bridges could have been built in a different year. It may be impossible to determine when exactly the road was built; the bridge dates are our best bet. --Rschen7754 03:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • You do not have a reliable source showing when the actual road was built? Dough4872 03:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Would maps be any more accurate? --Rschen7754 03:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Maps from the time period would work. Dough4872 03:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for fixes to be made. Dough4872 23:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to get to the rest of this as quickly as I can, but unfortunately the quarter has started again; it may take longer than 7 days. --Rschen7754 06:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Take your time, I will continue to hold the article. Dough4872 15:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Everything should be good to go. I apologize about the SPS; I should have caught that before nom'ing. --Rschen7754 04:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will now pass the article. Dough4872 04:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:California_State_Route_244/GA1&oldid=1136331310"