Talk:California State Route 52/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • The sentence "After this interchange, the freeway leaves the military base and enters the San Diego neighborhood of Tierrasanta, with an exit to Santo Road, before traversing Mission Trails Regional Park, an open space preserve, for a few miles." is long and needs to be split.
    • Disagree; it's grammatically correct. --Rschen7754 02:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Can the San Clemente Canyon Freeway name be mentioned in the lead and not bolded in the route description?
    • "The former governor Jerry Brown had stalled the construction of SR 52 from Santo Road to SR 67", isnt Jerry Brown the current governor? I would reword this to say "Jerry Brown, who was governor at this time."
    • There are a lot of redundant links to USD in the history. These should be removed.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • I do not see how an image of a bird is relevant to the article.
    • That's the songbird mentioned in the article. --Rschen7754 02:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 02:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]