Talk:California State Route 75/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 21:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "In 1933, the highway from the San Diego–Coronado Ferry to Route 2 (now I-5) was added to the state highway system.[13] This was later designated as Legislative Route 199.[14]" Merge and mention when Legislative Route 199 was designated.

   "In 1976, the California State Legislature renumbered the southern section (from I-5 to SR 125) SR 117,[49]" Might want to reword this sentence

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Looks pretty good, except for those two little things. SounderBruce 22:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. --Rschen7754 22:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

 Passed SounderBruce 22:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)