Talk:California State Route 78/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

From User:Rschen7754

This page is a long stub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rschen7754 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Classification

Does this page need to be a stub? Or does it need more history? --Rschen7754 22:30, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

I think we can take the stub off now; this page is looking good! nice work! =) --atanamir 03:51, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Exit list

I added an exit list, but I don't know the postmiles. If anyone knows those, feel free to fill them in. -Branddobbe 20:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 78/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The prose reads well. One suggestion I'd like to see is using the full name of a type of highway on first mention followed by the standard abbreviation in parentheses. Then you can abbreviate all other highways of that same type after that. The boldface for the memorial designations in the fourth paragraph of the route description is a minor MOS breach.
    Second part taken care of. Re first part - does that include the lead? --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I'd like to see some photos, but they aren't required.
    I'll try to pick some up when I go home in a few weeks. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just a few minor copy edits, and it's passable. Good job. Imzadi1979 (talk) 06:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
    Issues addressed and passing. Imzadi1979 (talk) 07:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Stack interchange

Question for those who are more in-tune with Wiki-ness than I: The interchange with I-15 in Escondido is not exactly a four-level Interchange, as it doesn't include a full set of flyover ramps; it's a parclo stack if anything (partial cloverleaf/partial stack) ... does anyone have any objections to changing that designation in the body of the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.131.178 (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Major Cities Box

Not Knowing that this had been done in multiple places, I started a thread on the control cities box at Talk:California State Route 14 Dave (talk) 22:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Protected

I've fully protected this article for one day to prevent further edit warring. Please seek consensus at a relevant talk page. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

{{editprotected}} The phrase "roadway continues southward as Vista Way to Oceanside" is incorrect: it should be "roadway continues west as Vista Way to downtown Oceanside" [1]. This is not an endorsement of the current version but at least fixes the factual inaccuracy in one of the warred over revisions. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Not done for now: I don't doubt that you are correct, but can you establish a consensus for this first please. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

CR S78?

The county route page lists a CR S78 which has been decommissioned and replaced by SR 78. The CR S78 page redirects here but it isn't mentioned in this article. What happened with S78? —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 16:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

It's in the article; see reference 27. --Rschen7754 17:37, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on California State Route 78. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:California_State_Route_78/Archive_1&oldid=880554877"