Talk:Camp Echo (Guantanamo Bay)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merging[edit]

What is the consenus on merging this article into Camp Delta. ant_ie 18:22, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why not merge Camp Delta, Camp X-ray Camp Iguana, and Camp Echo as a subsection to Guantanamo Bay? Wouldn't it be better to have one, well-written, NPOV article, without all the mispellings and typos. Joaquin Murietta 22:17, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. ant_ie 21:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

responsible use of tags...[edit]

Another contributor added an {{unbalanced}} tag to the article. When instantiated an unbalanced tag directs readers to a fuller explanation on the talk page. This contributor never got around to offering an explanation for this tag. I suggest this is an irresponsible use of the tag. If the tagger doesn't explain their concern good faith contributors can't know when those concerns have been adequately addressed.

If no one offers an explanation of this tag, the next time I visit this article I will remove it.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

don't fear the red-link[edit]

I reverted this excision which seems to be based on a misunderstanding of the value of red-links. What the excising contributor should have done was to have clicked on the "what links here" button of Camp_Echo_(Iraq). If they had done so they would have found the red-link had instances in two real articles: Polish zone in Iraq and Multinational Division Central-South. As such the hat-note was valid and useful and should not have been removed. Geo Swan (talk) 16:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:REDDEAL. While red-links can be useful this one here in the hatnote is not. Red links in hatnotes are useless as hatnotes serve a navigational prupose and should be replaced or removed. See also WP:REDDEAL. IQinn (talk) 17:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camp Echo (Guantanamo Bay). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Camp_Echo_(Guantanamo_Bay)&oldid=1206520759"