Talk:Camp Ondessonk

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 May 2014. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Camp Ondessonk is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tone, length[edit]

Hi, I tagged this article anew for tone and length. It is written like an advertisement, liberally sprinkled with adjectives such as "rustic" and heartwarming descriptions of the type of work done there. It is over 50KB in length, which is beyond the prescription for WP:SPLIT (not that we should split this, but pare it down to something single-article-sized.) Elizium23 (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: It's not over 50kB readable prose size, which is what the 50kB in WP:SPLIT is about. That being said, an article can be too long regardless. This one has quite a few bulleted lists that don't contribute to readable prose size but make it long nevertheless. I don't have a strong opinion either way. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 08:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]