Talk:Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
 | Canon PowerShot SX1 IS was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 20, 2009). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
GA Review[edit]
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Canon PowerShot SX 1 IS/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
I am failing this article because it is little more than a datasheet. It contains only 3 or so sentences of prose total and a feature list – which is duplicated in part or entirety by the Infobox.
It contains no references, on the very little information it has, that are not already contained in the "Sources" section – a group of four webpage links inserted into it. Additionally, at approximately 24 hours old, it is unlikely an article would be ready.
Because of the condition of this article I am not performing a full review under the Good Article criteria. The article should not be considered for nomination again unless it has been substantially expanded. To gain an understanding of the standard of a Good Article, I recommend examining recently-listed Good Articles or discussing suitable material for this article at a relevant WikiProject. –Whitehorse1 07:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)