Talk:Capability management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How many topics are there, and how many articles should there be?

  • Capability Management
  • Capability Management in Defense
  • Capability Management in Business

Cat4567nip (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The current general "Capability Management" article is clearly talking about the context of defense/defence and the capabilities referred to are clearly military capabilities.
This should be merged or re-titled into the "Capability Management in Defence" article and replaced with a more general Capability Management article. I am currently in the process of rewriting the relatively poor "Capability Management in Business" article to be the corresponding article about capability management in the business context - where the capabilities referred to are business capabilities, not military ones.
The main Capability Management article should disambiguate and incorporate what is common between the two different contexts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian Glossop (talkcontribs) 17:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capability management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]