Talk:Capitoline Brutus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

--DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long enough, new enough, neutral, well cited throughout, and no copyvio or close paraphrase found.

Both hooks are all right for length, AGF for citations to printed sources. Image is free, QPQ not required as explained by bot. Ready to go. Moonraker (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Ancient Rome is a pretty redundant link. Better link "ancient Roman bust" to Roman sculpture. Johnbod (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Is it my responsibility as the nominator to fix links like that? Or is that something that you guys do? Sorry, I haven't done this in a while. Lol. Pericles of Athens^Talk 03:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

</noinclude>

A fact from Capitoline Brutus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 August 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that there is no direct evidence that an ancient Roman bust known as the Capitoline Brutus is the Roman consul Lucius Junius Brutus it is commonly thought to depict?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Capitoline Brutus.

Wikipedia

Added scholarly theory

I added Massimilliano Papini's theory from Companion to Roman Art. Feel free to remove if too speculative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artever (talk • contribs) 16:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]