Talk:Care Continuum Alliance

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Disagreement with "Unencyclopedic" and "Newsrelease" Tags[edit]

On 14 October 2008, the user at IP address 208.81.184.4 added "Unencyclopedic" ("This article... may contain material not appropriate for an encyclopedia") and "Newsrelease" ("This article... reads like a news release, or is otherwise written in an overly promotional tone") tags to the article. I disagree with those tags for the following reasons:

As discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DMAA: The Care Continuum Alliance in August 2008, "DMAA: The Care Continuum Alliance is a well-established and widely recognized trade association... [and] has been cited extensively in the trade and popular press over the past decade." Therefore, it meets Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) criteria.
My edits, which are not yet complete, are intended to make the article meet Wikipedia:Neutral point of view criteria. Thus far I have added the following sentences (with refs) that are questioning or critical of the organization and therefore NOT characteristic of an organization's news releases:
- "In 2008, DMAA reported that it paid $60,000 in lobbying expenses to Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal."
- "The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act passed later that year was described as a 'major victory'... in that the law 'authoriz[ed] payment for services provided by its [i.e., DMAA's] members to people with chronic illnesses'."
- "The usefulness of the first volume was questioned because the guidelines were voluntary in nature and 'equivocate[d] on a number of key issues, preventing true standardization even if they were adopted industrywide'."

After I'm done editing (should be a few days from now), I ask someone else to please look at the article and (if you agree with my arguments) delete the "Unencyclopedic" and "Newsrelease" tags. Thanks. AppForCalPERSMCII (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with above, tags deleted. 152.79.85.72 (talk) 19:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Care Continuum Alliance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]