Talk:Carey McWilliams (journalist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lacks citations[edit]

The body of this article is totally lacking in citations. There is no way to verify anything said in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.234.146 (talk) 21:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 April 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 03:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Carey McWilliams (journalist)Carey McWilliams – I believe this article should be at Carey McWilliams. hatnotes can resolve any confusion with the marksman. jengod (talk) 00:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - There is a third Carey McWilliams on the disambiguation page. This one is certainly the most notable Carey McWilliams of the three but this change is not necessary, especially if "I believe" is the only rationale.
Kire1975 (talk) 06:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how to do Google results comparisons but just w/in Wikipedia there are 80+ incoming links to Carey McWilliams (journalist) and roughly four to Carey McWilliams (marksman), three of which are the personal-name disambiguation page, a surname list page, and List of people from Fargo, North Dakota.
The third person on the personal name disambiguation page published as Wilson Carey McWilliams (rather than just Carey McWilliams; no doubt choosing to do his own "disambiguation" early in his career since Carey McWilliams (journalist) was active and notable well before he was born). jengod (talk) 18:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose the journalist has 408 views but the marksman has 230 and Wilson Carey McWilliams has 99[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.