Talk:Carly Fiorina 2016 presidential campaign

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Carly Fiorina 2016 presidential campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance).

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

More sexism and foreign policy coverage needed[edit]

http://www.buzzfeed.com/sajp/if-men-were-treated-like-women-in-the-workplace

This video, made by Fiorina in an attempt at grabbing millennial votes, generated a significant amount of press and I think it is pertinent information in an article about her run for president. I also think her various statements regarding sexism and gender should be added at a later date, as they are important talking points of her campaign. As a whole, this article focuses far too heavily on criticism of her business career. I'm not advocating for the removal of that information, but I believe it should be balanced by thorough coverage of her actual campaigning. Beetlejuicex3 (talk) 03:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Strangle" comment[edit]

That material is just a blip in the campaign. Wikipedia is not news. I a few weeks that issue will be forgotten, not encyclopedic. - Cwobeel (talk) 22:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about 5,000 words, and that section is taking 10% of the article. This "incident" is all but forgotten, and will be a blip in a long year of campaigning. Not to mention that the text as written is not NPOV. - Cwobeel (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed that material, given the lack of interest in discussion the issue. Please abide by WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE and do not restore without a discussion toward consensus here. - Cwobeel (talk) 17:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved Mike Cline (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carly Fiorina presidential campaign, 2016 → Carly Fiorina presidential campaign – this article indicates the campaign began in 2015 so saying 2016 can mislead people. Specifying the year also doesn't seem necessary at present. I could only see this as necessary were she to run for president a second time in the future. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 07:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Current name is consistent with all other campaigns, both for this election and previous ones. See, for example, Category:United States presidential Republican Party campaigns, 2016, Category:United States presidential Republican Party campaigns, 2012 etc. Number 5 7 09:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for consistency reasons. sst✈ 12:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose WP:CONSISTENCY and some people have been running since 2012. The election is in 2016, so the title makes sense -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for consistency. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Primary results[edit]

According to The Green Papers, Fiorina placed 10th among Republicans in the primary with 40,666 votes. This is the 2nd highest vote total for a Republican woman after Margaret Chase Smith in 1964. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.38.14 (talk) 03:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Perenchio Endorsement[edit]

block evasion by User:DMGUSA. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:37, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please list this under endorsements in a way that isn't an "evade."

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.219.51 (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carly Fiorina presidential campaign, 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518090342/https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2015/03/2016-scouting-report-carly-fiorina to https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2015/03/2016-scouting-report-carly-fiorina

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]