Talk:Carol Blood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carol Blood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative history section[edit]

For the legislative history section, I removed all information that was only referenced in Nebraska Legislature primary sources. I felt that those should be removed under the purview of WP:NOTNEWS. In my opinion it was also WP:TMI. After all, there are US Senators with articles that are less detailed in regards to legislative history than Carol Blood, such as Roger Wicker and Brian Schatz. In my opinion, I don't think it's necessary to list all of Carol Blood's sponsored bills, unless those bills have received coverage in a reliable source. The section also just reads like a list of bills,. It might be more useful if the section was organized in a way to explain Carol Blood's political positions, such as here.  Bait30  Talk? 22:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mswari: Once again, I am going to remove all of the content in this section that is only referenced to primary sources. Wikipedia is not a news agency and interpretations of primary sources such as legislative bills require to derive their interpretations from secondary sources (see WP:PRIMARY).  Bait30  Talk? 04:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that unless it is sourced to a secondary source, and then only maybe, it should not be in the article, this is not a campaign page.--VVikingTalkEdits 23:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]