Talk:Carolinian and Piedmont

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Comment[edit]

Why are the Carolinian and Piedmont in the same article? Seems that should be addressed with a sentence at least in the opening article summary.Tom (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Particularly with the Piedmont adding another trip, it doesn't make any sense to keep the two combined. C628 (talk) 01:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Let's keep this as a stub page; we need to preserve the history and Amtrak does use the phrase now and then. I'll split out the pages to Carolinian (train) and Piedmont (train), with the latter moving to Piedmont Service once it's official. Mackensen (talk) 01:50, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. C628 (talk) 01:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]