The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
While this article was still a subpage of my user space for development purposes, and before it was moved to the mainspace, I privately contacted Cassandra Fairbanks off-wiki and asked her to upload to Wikimedia Commons a photo of herself to which she owned the right to assign for use on Wikipedia. I did so because I believe a picture greatly enhances the appearance of any BLP. She replied, "Please don’t put me on Wikipedia." It is therefore accurate to say that this biography was published over the objection of the subject. I promise to have no further contact off-wiki with Cassandra Fairbanks, whom I personally do not know and with whom I previously had no interaction online. NedFausa (talk) 19:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@NedFausa you're clearly compromised. if you weren't, this article would contain the truth about Fairbanks. 185.150.170.2 (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Gateway Pundit was deprecated in 2019 when Wikipedia editors reached consensus that the site is unacceptable as a source. It is unreliable for statements of fact, and given to publishing hoax articles and reporting conspiracy theories as fact. External URLs matching that domain are automatically reverted by XLinkBot when added to a page, including when added in a reference, by unregistered users and accounts under seven days old. Consequently, it is either impossible or inadvisable to cite the journalistic contributions of Cassandra Fairbanks to The Gateway Pundit. As a point of information (not a policy or guideline), Wikipedia acknowledges that a clear majority of sources deprecated for unreliability are politically conservative or right wing. Wikipedia describes this preponderance as "an artifact of a fundamental difference between conservative and non-conservative media, with conservative media clustered around a shared ideology while the rest of the media ecosystem has a 'reality-check dynamic' based on traditional journalistic fact-seeking."
I request consensus to restore this note, as it alone explains why we cannot cite the professional work of the subject of our WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 15:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't disagree with the content of the note, which reflects Wikipedia consensus on Gateway Pundit as a source. I just think it's not relevant to our readers, and doesn't belong in this article. It's advice for editors of Wikipedia, not part of a biography of Cassandra Fairbanks. See also WP:Avoid self-references and WP:No disclaimers. Robofish (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There have been repeated attempts to remove the piped parameter "nationwide riots" from the wikilinked George Floyd protests in the subsection Shift to right. This is disruptive because it falsely suggests that Cassandra Fairbanks criticized those protests. In fact, the cited source states (twice) that she criticized the riots associated with the protests, not the protests themselves. Moreover, Wikipedia's page George Floyd protests states in relevant part: While the majority of protests have been peaceful, demonstrations in some cities descended into riots, looting, and street skirmishes with police. … At least 200 cities in the U.S. had imposed curfews by June 3, while at least more than 30 states and Washington, D.C. activated over 62,000 National Guard personnel due to the mass unrest.
These misrepresentations have been made by four separate WP:SPA IP accounts, with editing warring by two of them, as follows:
.jpg){kind=small}
