Talk:Casualty 1907

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
	This redirect is supported by the British television task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Merge?[edit]

Someone's suggested merging this article with Casualty 1906 and I kinda agree. I mean they are kinda the same even though they're set in different years, and (especially at the moment anyway) there doesn't seem to be much info, plotwise) for either series. If that makes sense. londonsista | ^Prod 22:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was me, but I was in a rush and wasn't able to follow up the tagging here at the time. Considering we're looking at just four episodes in total, it's a bit extravagant to have two pages. Waking the Dead (TV series) is a a good model for how a combined page should be. Nick Cooper (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, because casualty 1906 was meant to be a one off and then it was decided to to make a follow up. Furthermore what would the page be called? So I think it would only cause confusion. Jamesplummett (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Why not start with a disambiguation page, that directs to c1906, c1907, c1909 and the one(s) who may/ will follow? After the definte end, then its time to decide to merge into a "casualty row". (no account, sorry) --92.226.197.181 (talk) 07:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's the likelihood there'll be a Casualty 1908 next year? Suggest merging content into Casualty 1906 and creating appropriate redirects to there. Frickative (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but the DVD release of 1906, 1907 and 1909 is simply titled Casualty 1900s [1]. A possible title for a merged article? Bradley0110 (talk) 14:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, these are broadcast in Australia (on UKTV) as series 1, 2 and 3 of "London Hospital" (http://www.uktv.com.au/programmes/show.asp?id=385 as at 31 July 2009) 122.107.80.75 (talk) 07:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]