Talk:Cathedral of the Transfiguration (Markham, Ontario)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments from December 2009[edit]

Isn't it really located in the community of Victoria Square? (hard to call cathedral town a community, just falling in with the developer)

How is it a cathedral? Isn't a cathedral the seat of a bishop? wouldn't it more properly be a basilica?

The building looks a little worse for wear. Grass isn't cut, front steps falling apart, roads not paved, basement doors rusty, no pews inside. What's up? Still a going concern or belly-up?

A basilica has to be declared such by the Vatican, so that term is not appropriate, either. "Former cathedral" is the most accurate term, since the building was a legitimate cathedral for a time. In the present tense it can't really be refered to as a cathedral or even a church (at least not a Catholic one). --145.226.30.45 (talk) 16:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from August 2011[edit]

The Roman Catholic Church classifies the Cathedral of the Transfiguration as a "Former" Cathedral. Perhaps the title for this article should match?

http://www.gcatholic.com/churches/data/cathCA.htm


The following references are inactive links, please remove.

^ http://www.nationalpost.com/story-printer.html?id=531e343f-5f8d-4400-b284-5c7923745ddc ^ a b http://www.catholicregister.org/content/view/49/849/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.127.12 (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following external links are inactive, please remove: National Post story Urban Toronto, Globe and Mail story

Comments from July 2013[edit]

The construction around the church has proceeded apace. I have current photos. Should I upload them?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cathedral of the Transfiguration (Markham). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Checked. --Andreios (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cathedral of the Transfiguration (Markham). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Massive series of edits done over January[edit]

  • The entire series of edits done this month were largely unencyclopedic and took away from the value of the article. Midnight-Blue766 (talk) 06:32, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]