Talk:Catholic Church in Bhutan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCatholic Church in Bhutan was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 13, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Overall, this article is too thin on information for GA status. It's primary need is for expansion.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The lead section should provide more of a summary/overview of the topic- at the very least a sentence or two about the status of Catholicism in Bhutan, and maybe a historical remark. The '21st Century' section is not well organized- it needs to be expanded, and possibly placed in chronological order. At present, it reads as a list of bare factoids.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The linked article does not provide a reference for the estimated number of Catholics in Bhutan- the article claims "hundreds", but this is for Christians total, not Catholics. The 'Asia at a Glance' link is broken- not a serious issue in itself, but it would be nice if to be able to check the reference. The claim that there are 200 or so Catholics in Bhutan seems suspect when paired with the statement that the first convert to Catholicism from Buddhism occurred in the 1980's, given that missionaries are barred from Bhutan.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    There's an unexplained gap of 340 years in the 'origins' section. Were there any consequences to the Jesuit contact in the 17th Century? Provides no detail or explanation regarding schools run by Catholic orders during the 20th Century, which is seemingly the major Catholic presence in Bhutan to date.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    This is fine right now, but it's a little concerning that all the sources for the 20th century section are articles from Catholic news agencies, a couple of them specifically engaged in evangelism in Asia. There may not be much in the way of non-Catholic sources writing about this issue, but there's the potential for bias to be introduced if contrasting views (where they exist) aren't reported and sourced as well.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No photos or illustrations. There may not be anything available, but a picture of the priest that is mentioned or something like that would be welcome.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    There are some organizational issues as well, but the paucity of information is the primary issue. I suspect that this reflects the absence of published literature about Western religion in Bhutan, rather than any failing of the involved editors- the available literature on this topic may simple be too immature to support GA/FA status at this time. I think expanding the coverage of the Jesuit schools in Bhutan would be an excellent starting point- there's likely to be more English-language information available here, and it seems to be fairly central to the history of Catholicism in Bhutan. --Clay Collier (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Roman Catholicism in Bhutan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catholic Church in Bhutan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]