Talk:Caxton Associates

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

content from the article[edit]

Many of the investments of Caxton are arranged through offshore subsidiaries controlled by Caxton located in the British Virgin Islands, Caxton International, a corporation of said origin, and Hamilton, Bermuda.[1]. Known investments are 5.1% positions in Intervoice, Inc.[1], the biopharmaceutical firm, Tercica, Inc.[2] It was the largest shareholder, with an 11% stake, in projector manufacturer InFocus,[3][4] until a private sale in late November, 2007 to Credit Suisse.[4]

Moving list of 2010 stock holdings to the talk page. Overly detailed. It might fit better within a larger article where undue weight isnt an issue. HaroldErica (talk) 02:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ a b "SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION". 10kwizard.com. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
  2. ^ Caxton Associates Accumulates 5.1% Stake in Tercica (TRCA)
  3. ^ Ranson leaves InFocus
  4. ^ a b Earnshaw, Aliza (2007-07-31). "InFocus cuts losses on sharply lower revenue". www.bizjournals.com. Retrieved 2010-04-22.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caxton Associates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]