Talk:Celsius 41.11

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 October 2006 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

(This has not been confirmed by any scholar in the field of medicine, and is likely quite false, as it only converts to a very hot, but undeadly 105.998 degrees fahrenheit.) - Removed this section as it is highley likely the brain would die at that temperature as the proteins in the brain cells would denature.

Untitled[edit]

I have added a website where the movie can be seen (Celsius 41.11 movie) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asteriks (talk • contribs) 11:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking a lot of stuff...[edit]

Um... This article is lacking everything... Like a plot, a detailed synopsis, anything. What's the deal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.180.218.34 (talk) 20:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Language on Celsius_41.11[edit]

(Comment moved here from an editor's Talk page, for further discussion. -Xenophrenic)

Hi, why is it necessary to keep the word "unconvincingly" in the first line of the synopsis? It seems to needlessly add bias and opinion to the article. Zaixionito (talk) 21:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Zaixionito. I think the simple answer is: our Wikipedia articles convey what the sources say. That cited source is just one of many that similarly describe the film's efforts and premise as unconvincing, so I don't see what the objection is. I see another source (NYTimes) is already cited in the article which also d the film's efforts as unconvincing. A third party examination of the film, which offers similar descriptions, can be found in The Rhetoric of the New Political Documentary by Benson & Snee. Xenophrenic (talk) 07:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celsius 41.11. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20081029224949/http%3A//www.celsius4111.com/ to http://www.celsius4111.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]