Talk:Cementite

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metalworking Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Charge of Fe?[edit]

Since carbide ion is 4- (when there is one carbon), what are the charges on the 3 Fe ions? Are they +1,+1 and +2? Or is there an error?RSido 01:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that you can assign clear oxidation numbers to the atoms in this structure. You might as well assign 0 to all atoms and think of it as an alloy! --Itub 19:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my formula. -lysdexia 11:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Composition in Weight Ratios[edit]

There is no mention of the composition in terms of percentage weight of carbon and iron for cementite in eutectoid structures. This is a pretty important number for applications in material science, the application with which information abut this substance is primarily concerned. I just think if people are looking up this article, it may very well be to find this value (its the reason I looked it up). Anyone have any thoughts regarding this? If no one has any complaints I'll add it within a day or two.Tracorn (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction with acids[edit]

Does anyone have some information on how cemetite reacts with acids on dissolution of steel. Will there be a carbon residue? Will it form methane? Will oxidizing acids convert it to carbon dioxide? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mass of Fe3C ?[edit]

After research, i could not find the volumic mass of Fe3C anywhere. Could someone please indicate it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.83.11.66 (talk) 15:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Earth's inner core contains significant iron carbide, suggests study[edit]

Hidden carbon in Earth’s inner core revealed by shear softening in dense Fe7C3

Bin Chen, Zeyu Li, Dongzhou Zhang, Jiachao Liu, Michael Y. Hu, Jiyong Zhao, Wenli Bi, E. Ercan Alp, Yuming Xiao, Paul Chow, Jie Li.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014; 201411154

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1411154111

2.98.241.120 (talk) 06:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cementite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090512154354/http://cst-www.nrl.navy.mil:80/lattice/struk/d0_11.html to http://cst-www.nrl.navy.mil/lattice/struk/d0_11.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]