Talk:Cencoroll

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reliable Reviews[edit]

In this article [1] manga.about.com, an established RS for anime and manga, refers to Anime Diet, Anime Almanac, Huffington Post, and Anime News Network as sites whose opinions on Ponyo are worth noting. I assume their reviews of other anime movies are equally valid. I would add reviews from any and all of those. However, of these, only ANN and Anime Diet have reviewed Cencoroll (I re-checked all four sites, plus of course manga.about.com itself.) Thus, right now we only have those two reviews. -moritheilTalk 15:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the author of that article on manga.about.com is citing several bloggers who reviewed the film, but says nothing about the notability or reliability of said bloggers. The fact that ANN is included in the section does not mean the other three are as reliable as that one. If you still feel Anime Diet is reliable, take it up at WT:ANIME.-- 22:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cencoroll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]