Talk:Censorship in Bhutan

Bhutan High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bhutan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Freedom of speech Mid‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bsible3, Darahhusser, Munchie56.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Bramlet removing Bhutantimes link again.--Divinemadman (talk) 03:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Divinemadman spamming Bhutantimes link again (it's already linked in the text). Bramlet Abercrombie (talk) 09:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As we discussed at Talk:Bhutan, it is the blocking of bhutantimes.com that is notable, and that mention of that should be made in this article. The blocking is noted in this article, along with the link in question, as an inline link. Adding this into the external links section is not appropriate here, and is not the consensus that was reached at Talk:Bhutan. To be more explicit in my reasoning, the link does not contain any information on censorship in Bhutan that could not be added to the article. Do we need to have this discussion over again? Kevin (talk) 05:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Censorship in Bhutan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070704234836/http://www.kuenselonline.com/modules.php?name=News to http://www.kuenselonline.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=8628

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:51, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Censorship in Bhutan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nab.gov.bt/Actpsession/50Bhutan%20Information%20Communication%20Act%202006Eng.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nab.gov.bt/Actpsession/13National%20Security%20Act%201992Eng.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706162944/http://www.nab.gov.bt/downloadsact/Dzo76.pdf to http://www.nab.gov.bt/downloadsact/Dzo76.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Briget Sibley - Peer Review Response[edit]

My article's peer review pointed out a few grammatical errors that I overlooked. I will begin to implement those changes to my article before it hits the live space. It was also recommended that we find more sources to improve our article. I will look for those to add more information to our article to better the section I am creating. Overall, I thought our peer reviews were fair and pointed out ideas from a different view point other than my own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsible3 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]