Talk:Central Min

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

Min Zhong → Minzhong – correct pinyin spelling rules. — AjaxSmack 08:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at: Talk:Min Nan#Requested move.

Minzhong language template[edit]

If you are a native speaker of Minbei then you can help translate this template into your own language:

czo

This user is a native speaker of Minzhong.

Edit

For example, here is the template for Mindong:

cdo

Cī ciáh ê̤ṳng-hô gì mū-ngṳ̄ sê Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄.
茲隻用戶其母語是閩東語。

--Amazonien (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Min Nan which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Number of speakers[edit]

The 3.1 million figure from Ethnologue (cited to the 2000 census) looks like another error, given that the population of the whole of Sanming prefecture in the 2000 census was 2,574,000, and the Central Min area was about 950,000. The Language Atlas of China (1987) gives a figure of 683,000. That's a bit old, but probably the best we have (unless someone has access to the 2012 edition). Kanguole 14:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]