Talk:Central Tower (San Francisco)

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Merge articles?[edit]

See Talk:Spreckels Building, San Francisco, California#Merge articles? as I understand this building has a number of pages about it that might benefit from being one article. DVD 02:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I'm going to propose that both articles: The Call Building, and Spreckels Building, San Francisco, California be merged to this article, the current location. DVD 03:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just redirect them. P.S. Double-check anything found on emporis.com. NVO (talk) 03:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I double-checked and redirected them. Best, DVD 03:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current photo needed[edit]

It would be good to add a current photo to this article, showing how the building now looks. --98.232.176.109 (talk) 01:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the photo is current. tedder (talk) 03:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Art Deco?[edit]

The original Call Building was Baroque Revival and Beaux Arts, per The American skyscraper, 1850-1940: a celebration of height, page 212. In 1938 it was radically refurbished and "Art-Deco-ized" (same source). This is not mentioned in the article at all, and no assessment of the success of the 1938 refurb is given. No judgment is made as to whether the building changed from one combination of two styles to a standalone Art Deco work. At The Skyscraper Page, the building is classified as a combination of Streamline Moderne (a late Art Deco style) and neo-classicism, implying an incomplete transition.

My main complaint about the Art Deco category is that there is no discussion at all about Art Deco in the body of the article. We cannot go around assigning categories based on personal opinion, we must have expert sources at hand. Binksternet (talk) 03:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i think that's a completely unnecessary level of pedanticism. one only need look at the building to see the style, but you can use this link for a source. --emerson7 04:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not too much to ask that a category be represented by article text. Not pedantic at all. Binksternet (talk) 04:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Central Tower (San Francisco). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203005023/http://www.aanb.org/html/en/architects_in_the_comm/jl-chasing.html to http://www.aanb.org/html/en/architects_in_the_comm/jl-chasing.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]