Talk:Cepola haastii

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem removed[edit]

This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you. --Geronimo20 (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. — The Earwig @ 22:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Red bandfishCepola haastii — "red bandfish" actually refers to all members of the genus Cepola, but particularly Cepola macrophthalma, the European species. --innotata (Talk | Contribs) 15:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support — the scientific name is far less ambiguous and far more common in reliable sources than a pseudo vernacular name. --Una Smith (talk) 23:27, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – seems fine; move carried out successfully. — The Earwig @ 22:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.