Talk:cfdisk
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cfdisk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 July 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled 1[edit]
not functionally equivalent; fdisk is more mature and reliable than cfdisk—Trevor Caira 14:44, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Not according to the fdisk 2.12p man-page: "There are several *fdisk programs around. Each has its problems and strengths. Try them in the order cfdisk, fdisk, sfdisk. (Indeed, cfdisk is a beautiful program that has strict requirements on the partition tables it accepts, and produces high quality partition tables. Use it if you can. fdisk is a buggy program that does fuzzy things usually it happens to produce reasonable results. [...])"
- Funny, due to incredible amount of bugs (misreading existing partitions, creating corrupt partitions etc) it has been removed from at least one linux distro (Redhat). I guess everyone has his own view of cfdisk ;-) --Xerces8 (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Here is the removal documented. If they readded it later, someone say so. --Xerces8 (talk) 12:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Untitled 2[edit]
Who is the author of cfdisk? Is it Kevin E. Martin? -- Sy / (talk) 12:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Status as of early 2011[edit]
In 2010, hard drives with 4 KB sector sizes have been introduced. Besides, with the increasing size of hard drives, partition table formats such as GPT and partition best practices have evolved, the tendency being to ditch support for CHS geometries and align partitions on 1 MB boundaries.
- parted has evolved to support all of that
- fdisk has evolved to support most of that (still doesn't do GPT)
- cfdisk has not evolved (not yet?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.67.126.180 (talk) 06:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cfdisk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060518195533/http://www.linux.org:80/docs/ldp/howto/IBM7248-HOWTO/cfdisk.html to http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/IBM7248-HOWTO/cfdisk.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Version number[edit]
I don't think the version number of util-linux should be included in this article, cfdisk itself doesn't have a version number.
$ cfdisk -V
cfdisk from util-linux 2.35.1