Talk:Chainsaw safety features

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Re-write[edit]

Hello;

I'm preparing a complete re-write of this page as it's clearly due for one.

Nailgunner (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still ongoing. I have approached Oregon for permission to use some of their great photos of saw chain for illustrative purposes. more to follow :) Nailgunner (talk) 23:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nailgunner! I first wrote this page long ago as a revision exercise for a chainsaw exam. (I passed!) It's great to see someone want to better it, thanks. If you're adding stuff about chain design, it might be nice to create a separate "chainsaw chain design" page. Chains are quite complicated and there is plenty of material. But, I'm not going to do it! Good Luck! Emrys2 (talk) 14:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emrys2;

Cheers. A seperate saw chain design page would be quite a bit of work! Not that that's a bad thing by any means. I may have to read around a few more of the more complex aspects of chain design, as you say it's a big job. I'll go and have a long think on it ;) Nailgunner (talk) 23:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chainsaw safety features. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100331081302/http://www.stihl.co.uk/pdf/chainsaw.pdf to http://www.stihl.co.uk/pdf/chainsaw.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

chainsaw handedness[edit]

while there are few purely left handed chainsaws I believe that there are ambidextrous chainsaws Caucasianhamburger (talk) 13:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True, but they're uncommon and probably nearly impossible to get second-hand. 2604:2D80:6305:600:213A:2609:9F77:1BDF (talk) 06:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification for Top-handle saws[edit]

The article doesn't explain the safety issues related to top-handled saws and only says not to use them for ground-based work. This is a bad way to get the point across because people will just assume that the safety issues can be mitigated by using both hands. As someone who owns a top-handle and uses it on the ground, I think people need to understand the unique dangers and how to reduce injury. The reason why they're dangerous is that when branches fall, logs move, or stuff swings at you, your brain assumes your left hand isn't doing anything important because its not holding the weight of the saw. This causes you to almost instinctively reach out or up with your left hand putting it near the blade. This causes wrist injuries that other chainsaws are far less likely to do.

This article needs to explain that(with sources obviously) so anyone reading the article who already uses one of those saws - or may use one regardless of the warnings - knows that they need to have a durable Kevlar glove that protects their left hand and wrist.

Just saying people shouldn't use that type of saw just isn't going to cut it. They're often the only cheap, lightweight saws available due to the relative lack of tiny rear-handle saws. 2604:2D80:6305:600:213A:2609:9F77:1BDF (talk) 06:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]