Talk:Chakma language

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article is currently listed on the project's Peer review department

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Chakma language was copied or moved into Chakma alphabet with this edit on 2 August 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Changma/ Chakma language[edit]

the article has been enriched & re-written. plz review it

Souvik.arko (talk) 12:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chakma language vs Chakma Script[edit]

Thank you souvik for updating this article. However I feel that majority of this fits into the Chakma Script page. What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 8liability (talk • contribs) 23:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

The article is easy to review. It reads like an article on a script, and it features much too prominently a script that no one needs to learn to understand Chakma as a language system. Except for some rare infos on the phonology that might as well only reflect the analysis evident in the script (which is not necessarily correct) and some infos in the lead, there is no actual linguistic information. I'm not sure whether to rate it stub class or very weak start class, so I refrained from rating for the time being. G Purevdorj (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a technical problem with this page[edit]

As of Jan 2013, the page reads “It is written using the Chakma script, which is also called U+E008 U+E027 U+E010 U+E01C U+E013 U+E030 Ajhā pāṭh, sometimes romanized Ojhopath.” in the opening paragraph. The codepoints which I have converted for that quote correspond to the Private Use Area and, thus, have no semantics. (On my system, they appear as Tengwar, which makes me think that Firstborn inhabit the mountains of North East India).

I see that the Chakma Script article uses correct codepoints for Chakma characters. Someone speaking Chakma should simply enter the correct string of Chakma characters (my guess is 𑄃𑄏𑄧 𑄛𑄧𑄒, but then nobody knows); since it is unclear which font and which font mapping the original author of that PUA-expresion used, it cannot be fixed by algorithm. 114.129.8.6 (talk) 10:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chakma language/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

=== Chakma language === I have edited the article..plz review & give suggestions Souvik.arko (talk) 12:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 11:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Keyboard Layouts[edit]

Hi,

I've removed the Script section because:

It should be in Chakma alphabet instead of here;
It was just keyboard layout images with no reference to check accuracy, no explanation or analyse, one had circled glyphs but no legend to tell why.

Regards, --Lacrymocéphale 08:28, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Official status[edit]

I couldn't find any source that can support the claim that Chakma language has official status in India, in any form. There is no mention of Chakma on Languages with official status in India. The state of Mizoram lists only three languages: Mizo, English and Hindi, as official languages. The Chakma Autonomous District Council is more of an organization and not a geographic/political entity. The officials and members of the organization may use Chakma language in their activities but that doesn't mean Chakma language has official status in the context we are talking about. Za-ari-masen (talk) 10:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chakma lekai lengguwes 223.231.77.162 (talk) 20:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]