Talk:Chalk Hill AVA

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wine, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WineWikipedia:WikiProject WineTemplate:WikiProject WineWine articles

California: San Francisco Bay Area Stub‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Harvest schedule[edit]

I question the value of the statement that grapes in Chalk Hill are harvested in September, when surrounding areas are harvested in October. That is just a little too simplistic. Different varietals of grapes are harvested at different times. Individual years may move harvest forward or back by two or three weeks. This year, 2010, we are getting ready to harvest pinot noir in Chalk Hill (as of Sept. 21) on a vineyard for which we contract the fruit. Pinot noir is one of the first varietals to be harvested. In the same week we expect to harvest pinot noir in Healdsburg and by the end of the month at our own vineyard in Santa Rosa. I would expect harvest to be a bit later in Green Valley over towards Graton. But if we had pinot noir in Alexander Valley (north of Chalk Hill), I would expect it to come in earlier than any of these, because it is warmer. (Cab and Zin are much more commonly planted there as a result). Kmslogos (talk) 12:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note the qualifying word "often". I'm sure that your personal observations are valid. Unfortunately, they don't constitute a reliable source. --Stepheng3 (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chalk Hill AVA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080119234526/http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov:80/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;sid=bff700d0bbb2a632948b70fe7e91d7d4;rgn=div5;view=text;node=27%3A1.0.1.1.7;idno=27;cc=ecfr to http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;sid=bff700d0bbb2a632948b70fe7e91d7d4;rgn=div5;view=text;node=27%3A1.0.1.1.7;idno=27;cc=ecfr#27:1.0.1.1.7.3.41.32

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]