This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
I removed contentious material re so-called caucus scandal. Most fair-minded observers note that the scandal itself was overblown. Articles such as this provide some perspective. I would argue that if we are to include this material on a living person, the content should include controversial context of the scandal itself. WondermentDaily (talk) 18:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The trial and conviction was reported in the new media and is public knowledge; this was cited in the article. Thank you-RFD (talk) 11:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added two additional citations: 1.-a Milwaukee Sentinel Journal article concerning Charles Chvala. The article mentioned the conviction; 2.-a Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision about the trial and conviction. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is no doubting this scandal happened. I object to not providing context and the lack of a fuller bio. The scandal does not tell the whole story of the person, but your edits don't reflect that. If you want to help, please expand the article itself. Also, please keep facts accurate re years served. Thank you.WondermentDaily (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
