Talk:Charles Glen King

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Glen or Glenn[edit]

Glen or Glenn? --Wetman 06:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn. I'll move the page. — Vijay 01:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Um, it's not clear. I'll not move the page! — Vijay 01:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A quick googling seems to show that "Glen" is used by many authoritative groups. Glenn tends to appear on websites and such, but not in PDFs and articles. For now, I'll change it to Glen. — Vijay 02:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question of Attribution[edit]

According to an article¹ written by Max Perutz in 1988, the question of attribution is more complicated than described in the article on Charles Glen King. Max Perutz received the Nobel Prize for describing the structure of hemoglobin and myoglobin using X-ray crystallography. He also served on the Nobel Committee. In the 1980’s, Max Perutz asked the Nobel Committee if he could look at their files on the isolation and identification of Vitamin C.

Max Perutz notes in his article: (1) The Nobel committees do not themselves nominate candidates for the prize. Although Szent-Gyorgyi received several nominations, no one nominated King. (2) The committee did appoint a referee. The referee determined that Szent-Györgyi's role had been outstanding, but that the combined contributions of Haworth, Reichstein, King and others was equal to or greater than that of Szent-Gyorgyi himself. Therefore no Nobel Prize was awarded for the discovery of Vitamin C at the time when Szent-Gyorgyi was first nominated. (3) When Szent-Györgyi received the Nobel Prize in 1937, it was "for his discoveries in connection with biological combustion processes, with special reference to vitamin C and the catalysis of fumaric acid."

¹Perutz, M.F., Two Roads to Stockholm. New York Review of Books, Volume 35, Number 15 · October 13, 1988

Svirbely 20:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Some" versus "Many"[edit]

First paragraph states, "Many feel he deserves equal credit with Szent-Gyorgi for the discovery of this vitamin. [1]" The citation [1] is phrased less emphatically, "In recognition of this medical breakthrough, some scientists believe that King deserved a Nobel Prize." Svirbely 08:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Vitamin B" in text[edit]

Which B or Bs did he work on? Notreallydavid 20:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Uncle[edit]

This man was my great uncle :-D 212.50.162.251 09:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

The first citation (see below) in the External links section is a dead link. US National Library of Medicine Collection of Charles Glen King's papers and biography. Accessed January 2007Svirbely (talk) 20:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Glen King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]