Talk:Charles Lappenbusch/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Lead[edit]

  • Delete for a time, too colloquial
  • at which he served , you use "in which" later in the lead, which sounds better to me
  • for 20 seasons, and was their all-time wins comma not needed

Early life and education[edit]

Coaching career[edit]

  • Lappenbusch was hired by the school as assistant line coach in 1931., not immediately apparent to the layman that this is referencing American football
  • mass produced should have a dash in it
  • of the day including Frank Leahy of Notre Dame. comma before including

Personal life and death[edit]

  • I'm not sure the first 2 sentences are encyclopedic. Anyway to merge them or summarize them in a more encyclopedia way? The way the yare written almost seem like "fun facts"
    • I deleted the second sentence. I slightly reworded the first one - I kind of like it, but I can remove it if you want.

Works[edit]

  • No comments

Head coaching record[edit]

  • Could you distinguish that it is football without using a section header? Typically we don't have a single sub-header like this.
    • As for as I'm aware that's how its done for college coaches of multiple sports, but I could change it to perhaps "Head football coaching record" if you'd like.
  • Add the text "Source:" before Ref #14
    • I'm sorry, I'm not exactly understanding what you're asking me to do - could you elaborate? I'm not exactly sure adding "Source:" after and died in September 1996 in Enumclaw, Washington would make sense.

References[edit]

  • Spot check:
      1. 3 looks good.
      2. 4 looks good.
      3. 8 looks good.
      4. 11 looks good.
      5. 12 looks good

Images[edit]

  • Image is non-free but appears appropriate.

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:12, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.