Talk:Charles M. Tanner

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.covenantplayers.org/Content.aspx?pid=1 http://www.covenantplayers.org/Content.aspx?pid=2 http://www.covenantplayers.org/Content.aspx?pid=38. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ⌘macwhiz (talk) 01:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see that a previous revision exists before the copyright infringement, but that revision is wholly unencyclopedic and unsuitable for use in any number of ways. It seemed better to completely stub the article, as the subject seems likely to be notable. However, the article needs to be completely rebuilt with proper sources. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 01:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support your stubbing of the article, which resolved numerous issues in addition to the blatant copyvio. — Satori Son 01:51, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]