Talk:Charles R. Kesler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles R. Kesler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV?[edit]

Several of the notes toward the end of this page appear to be puffery---I'm thinking in particular of identifying trivial vaguely positive facts about the subject's books. One book had a note that it appears in 500 libraries---a meaningless (and unsourced) fact that seems to have no point other than to create an impression of its importance. The page also trumpets the sales ranking of his edition of the Federalist Papers. (As the Federalist Papers is public domain text in English, its hard to see what having the best-selling edition means---is it the cheapest? Most readable typeface?) Paultopia (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]