Talk:Charlie Williams (comedian)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

i take issue with the use of the word "tragedy" and "tragic" in this biographic article. Without meaning to sound cold hearted, this man was neither killed or died in tragic circumstances, indeed he was a relatively old man with a very common set of ailments.

A few things missing from this article - his mother's nationality/race, and the fact that he occasionally used jokes making fun of other races, especially Pakistanis. Also, he msut've been one of England's first black professional footballers? --MartinUK 21:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. The "Tragedy" section needs to be removed, and what little actual information it contains should be integrated into the main part of the article by someone who is familiar with his life. Dfeuer 21:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Race[edit]

Is it necessary that he be called "black"? I don't think this should be included unless his race is relevent to the article in some way (e.g. "he was the first black comedian to..."); article about white persons don't often describe the subject as white. -Adasta- 16:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Better? I am tempted to go for [WP:DYK]], but it may have been a bit too big before I started. -- ALoan (Talk) 21:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Adastra, I think you have to take the reference to a balck comedian in context of the 70s. Black people were not often seen on TV, and rarely as headliners. As a modern day comparison, if a white person were to be selected to play for the West Indies at cricket in the next series, he would always be described as "the first white cricketer to play for the West Indies since Geoff Greenidge" irrespective of his achievements. Thus, I think it is correct to use the term, provided it remains in context.WillE 18:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Charliewilliams.jpg[edit]

File:Charliewilliams.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rhodesia tour[edit]

Found a clip here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S2NKlMW0vc --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charlie Williams (comedian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]