Talk:Charlie Wilson (Ohio politician)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

Domestic abuse allegations[edit]

I have removed allegations of domestic abuse as being non-notable. Since this article is a BLP, I believe discussion should take place before this type of content is added. Tiderolls 04:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is a court allegation. The edit makes it clear that it was an allegation. There is not dispute that the cites are to real court documents. I am not aware of any statement made by Wilson or anyone that disputes the facts of the court document, but please feel free to add such content. Otherwise, please stop removing the content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.87.176.66 (talk) 17:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a bit more complicated than that. Notability of the circumstances has a part to play in determining whether the content stays. Also, your response did not address the BLP concerns. Perhaps you could explain why you think the event(s) are notable and why they belong in the article. "It's a fact" is not a reason. Tiderolls 18:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is notable because he is a public official. He beats his wife. I don't see how that would not be relevant for his race for Congress, which he has now lost. Mark Foley's page notes his fondness for male pages. I guess that you have a political agenda of trying to hide highly relevant, but damaging, information from people who look up Democratic congressmen, but there is no justification in deleting the content. If you think that it could be noted in a more neutral way, please go ahead and do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.163.144 (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the content added was an "allegation"? In any event, the formula you put forth (public official+bad thing=notablility) does not necessarily follow. I am flattered, though, that you attach a liberal bias to me. As I hail from one of the most red states in the union (crimson, one might opine), it indicates that I am editing neutrally. I am also removing the recently added "loss may be due, in part..." content as it is definitely an editor drawing a conclusion. Please read WP:Notability, WP:BLP and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and try to make your case using Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tiderolls 23:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving a notice on your talk page that I have replied in this discussion, I noted that several editors have left you messages regarding neutral point of view. When more than one person attempts to tell you something it may indicate that there are concerns that need to be addressed. Tiderolls 18:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charlie Wilson (Ohio politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]