Talk:Cheapside

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Modern Cheapside[edit]

I have brought this section up to date, the area is now the principal retail street of the City. It remains a principal traffic route from the West End through to the East End. 79.75.31.166 (talk) 10:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC) Tony S[reply]

The statement needs citation - you should provide evidence of the planning policies referred to, arguably including specific reference to Cheapside as a street where such developments should be encouraged. As for it being a "principal traffic route from the West End through to the East End", I'd tend to disagree. Depending on your definition of East End (most would consider that starts at Spitalfields these days) I'd argue the principal route would run either down Old Street—Clerkenwell Road—Theobalds Road or Bishopsgate—London Wall—Newgate Street—Holburn Viaduct - I doubt many cabbies would take you up (or down) Cheapside at the expense of those two options though I accept the tourist bus routes would take Cheapside—Ludgate Hill—Fleet Street. Given the article indicates Cheapside was the principal East—West thoroughfare prior to the 20th Century, arguably the contemporary Cheapside section should update the reader to indicate it is no longer the main route but just one of many. What do others think? Dick G (talk) 02:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Knight's Tale[edit]

The use of "unsalubrious" is not entirely incorrect. While "insalubrious" may be the common antonym, I believe "unsalubrious" is also acceptable under rules of adjectival construction. Moreover "salubrious" may be used as an epithet to describe something as "wholesome" as well as "sanitary". The use is partially relevant in this context as it identifies the area as a poor, unhealthy, low-class neighbourhood. The character's roots in such an area are a key facet of the plotline and are illustrative of the area's heritage and perception throughout the ages. Perhaps a better formulation might be used (and I'll have a go at rewording) but the point is not without value. Dick G (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Statue[edit]

Who is the man in the statue looking east in the 1890 photo (near where St Paul's station now is)? Is it Peel? Apparently there used to be lots of statues of him. Paulturtle (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cheapside. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cheapside. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228141439/http://www.harcourtbooks.com/ to http://www.harcourtbooks.com/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/LGNL_Services/Environment_and_planning/Urban_design/Street_scene_challenge/Projects_in_the_pipeline/Cheapside%2BArea.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cheapside. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]