Talk:Chemetco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleChemetco was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 6, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
April 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 3, 2019Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

NPOV?[edit]

This seems to be more about their legal troubles than about the company. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my googling on this subject produced a lot of evidence that this company is notable for being a polluter, which would explain (perhaps) your observation. There is a brief history section and information about production at the site. I'm not sure what else you would suggest? Jezhotwells (talk) 15:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If it represents the weight of sources, then it's OK. I would have thought such a large company would have more about its history and non-polluting dealings, but if not, that's fine. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indicted/proecuted vs. criminalised.[edit]

I agree with the GA review that criminalised (c.f. Criminalization) is the wrong word to use. However indicted or prosecuted are also wrong as they both mean the company has been sent to trial, but does not include the fact that it has been found guilty.

This has now been cleared-up, avoiding both terms. 'Convicted of', the replacement, is objectively true and otherwise unproblematic.Astral Highway (talk) 15:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee plant?[edit]

Can anybody confirm that the Chemet Co. Superfund site in Moscow, Tennessee is a separate company? The name is very similar but the Chemetco (no space) article says that the company had only the one site, in Illinois, and I've not been able to find any link between Chemet Co. and Chemetco on Google. The List of Superfund sites in Tennessee article used to link to Chemetco but I've deleted that link as I believe it's unrelated. Can anybody confirm this? Dricherby (talk) 10:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Geographical Coordinates wrong?[edit]

The coordinates may be for their offices in Hartford. The Superfund plant site is farther south at 38.798,-90.095 and extends along Chemetco Lane (closed to commercial use). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.73.22.113 (talk) 17:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chemetco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chemetco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chemetco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemetco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this article still a featured article ?[edit]

I am translating this article in French.

I am surprised to notice that most of the external links are dead, despite some updates made by bots. But the worse is that this article almost only deals with an environmetal problems, whereas Chemetco was a leading enterpise, developping many metallurgical processes.

The lack of comparison with the Metallo-Chimique belgian company of Beerse, where Denis L. Feron was living, and which was the leading user of the Kaldo converter is stricking.

Imo, this is a newpapers compilation, and not a encyclopedic article. In 2009, the evaluations for featured articles were certainly not so stern.

Renaming this article into Closure of Chemetco must be the easiest way to solve the problems. Borvan53 (talk) 12:15, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Chemetco/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article almost only deals with environmetal problems, whereas Chemetco was a leading enterprise, developping many metallurgical processes. The lack of comparison with the Metallo-Chimique belgian company of Beerse, where Denis L. Feron was living, and which was the leading user of the Kaldo converter is stricking.

Imo, this is a newpapers compilation, and not a encyclopedic article. Then most of the external links are dead, despite some updates made by bots. Renaming this article into Closure of Chemetco must be the easiest way to solve the problems. But it will remain a very superficial article.

In 2009, the evaluations for good articles were certainly less demanding.

Borvan53 (talk) 22:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Borvan53: a reminder to finish your review by either keeping it listed or delisting it. :) --MrClog (talk) 13:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article is not a GA. It is disappointing that I am alone in giving my opinion about it. Borvan53 (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Borvan53, I agree with you. Also, because it is an individual reassesment, you may close the review even if there are few/no other comments. --MrClog (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you MrClog for your answer. I am delisting this article. Borvan53 (talk) 10:27, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chemetco&oldid=1206638942"