Talk:chemicalize

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because this article is more like a stub right now. I'd like to carry on editing the article, adding more information to that.
Another issue: Is it worth at all to create an article about the chmicalize.org? - I would say: yes. This is a free web tool that had its real kick-off this year (I personally met with the technology on the American Chemical Society's 2011 spring meeting in Anaheim, CA). For chemists, students studying chemistry, teachers and professors and nevertheless for those professionals dealing with drug discovery this tool is really useful and widely known among them.

Well, if I misunderstood something about the reasons of the rapid deletion please explain.
Have a nice day anyway!

--Jojojoe (talk) 10:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on this page—I've declined the speedy deletion request. Wikipedia:Notability (web) may be useful in case this comes up again. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 13:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 13:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chemicalize.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]