Talk:Chicago Knights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

Should this article and the Milwaukee Bonecrushers article be merged? If not, then they shouldn't both claim to be the same team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Micah008 (talkcontribs) 03:09, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Chicago Cardinals (CIFL) be merged into Chicago Knights. The Cardinals and the Knights are the same franchise, just with a new name, so I don't see where the Cardinals are notable enough to have their own article separate from the Knights. Tom Danson (talk) 20:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file problems with File:ChicagoCardinalsCIFL.png[edit]

File:ChicagoCardinalsCIFL.png is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:ChicagoCardinalsCIFL.png. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 15:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chicago Knights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]