Talk:Child beauty pageant

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of beauty pageants, their contestants and winners on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Beauty PageantsWikipedia:WikiProject Beauty PageantsTemplate:WikiProject Beauty PageantsBeauty Pageants articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[edit]

A child beauty pageant is a beauty contest featuring contestants including six months old and older but you have to stop pageants at 18 for children pageants.[citation needed]

Why is a citation needed for this? This is an obvious sentence considering the legal definition of 'child' in the USA(worldview issues aside). We wouldn't say "Bullshit is the feces excreted by male cattle." and then stick a citation needed tag on that.

Also 'including and younger than' is ugly wording so I've changed that to 'up to'. ~Alison C. (aka Crazytales) 04:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Law : interdiction in France[edit]

Some countries in Europe, mainly France and Belgium, are on their way to ban this kind of contest. It might be useful to complete the "Law" section in the near future Kromsson (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. This is what I came to this article to try to find out. They many be banned in Scandanavia and Russia and there have been calls to ban them in New Zealand. CoronaryKea (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Child beauty pageant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Child beauty pageant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://libra.nazlib.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130325163200/http://www.graceandcharmpageant.com/current-pageants.html to http://www.graceandcharmpageant.com/current-pageants.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

It's possible to present both facts and public opinion on a topic without losing objectivity. Statements such as "Makeup and surgery should not be a concernment [sic] for children and toddlers" and "[...] and the sad thing is that parents are the ones who encourage this behavior", while most of us would agree, are opinions being presented as fact. I will revise some of the offending language, but try to keep edits within the scope of WP:Neutral point of view. 47.220.146.206 (talk) 01:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]