Talk:Children's Crusade (1963)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redirect to Children's Crusade section of "Birmingham Campaign"[edit]

I was going to attempt to flesh this article out when I discovered a very detailed, well-sourced history of the event is documented at the Birmingham campaign article. I'm being bold and going ahead with a redirect to that section of the page. - Owlsmcgee (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for the age of the children in the crusade? Jerry lavoie 03:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this user changed the age in the paragraph at events to read "children as young as four" versus the original "children as young as six". Jerry lavoie 20:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am reverting the edit for now. Please provide a citation of a verifiable source before changing it again. Thanks. Jerry lavoie 03:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well i can't give you an exact link or anything but i watched a video about the children's march [titled epononymously], and a man who was thrown in jail [being interviewed] claimed that he asked a four year old child why he was in jail that he could only say "Teedom." LollyLo 04:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think this is sufficiently verifiable at the moment to warrant inclusion in the article. I suggest putting it on the article talk page so that perhaps another editor will know a link to a transcript of the show or an article that quotes it. Jerry lavoie 20:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interview with Child Crusader Rev. Gwendolyn Cook Webb[edit]

In a History of the Sixties in America course at Baruch College, I had the pleasure of interviewing a former participant of the Children's Crusade (1963) and current CEO of Foot Soldiers International, Reverend Gwendolyn Cook Webb. I conducted this interview for my final research project and it has not been officially published because I am awaiting her consent, so I decided to publish it on this article's talk page. So, please do not refer to this interview elsewhere; I simply thought it necessary to get a firsthand account out there as public knowledge. My essay's aim was to highlight a participant of the Civil Rights Movement who deserves more credit than she has been given, which aligns with the focus of Rev. Webb's organization. Foot Soldiers International seeks to “stimulate and help provide services, assistance and other activities which give promise of progress toward the eradication of violence, racism, domestic violence and poverty through developing work shops, employment opportunities, improving human performance, motivation and productivity”[1]. In 1963, she was a participant of an event that created some of the most iconic images of the Civil Rights Movement: the Birmingham Children’s March on City Hall. Most of us have seen horrific videos of people being hosed by white firemen and K9 German shepherds biting and chasing people. One of the misconceptions surrounding this moment in Civil Rights history is that it was Dr. King’s idea and that he was at the helm of offering up children since he knew it would be televised heavily. This is one of the many things I was curious about and asked her. In truth, MLK was horrified with sending children to the front lines. On the strategy of filling the jails, Rev. Webb said: “That was not Dr. Kings strategy, only Dr. Bevels [sic], that's why Dr. King sent for his organizer which was Dr. Bevel. Dr. King never would have done that. I thought it was a brilliant move. Like playing chess, you're in it to win it”[2]. Further, I asked her if she volunteered herself and she said: “We as young people volunteered under our own volition, even though we knew it could mean death for some of us” [2]. In fact, as aforementioned, it was that dangerous. On D-Day, the name given to the first day of the March, almost 1000 children, young men and women electively got arrested. It shocked the white community. They fought back viciously. I asked Rev. Webb: “There is such an incredible juxtaposition between the triumphant and even joyous arrests of D-Day, Day 1, and the sheer violence of fire hoses and police dogs of the following days. How did this impact the sentiment of the movement? Did you feel demoralized, or rather, invigorated with a stronger fervor in the fight for freedom?”[2]. Her definitive and triumphant response was: “I, We were invigorated, with a stronger fervor in the fight for freedom. They were demoralized, they were beaten by us kids, without violence. We did it the way Christ did it, and still forgave them. I became the second black female cop on that racist department :-)!!!!!!!”[2]. I also asked her some questions about how she felt about the SCLC ‘s nonviolent strategy and how she felt it succeeded. I found out that her family did not teach her much about discrimination, white supremacy, or lynching. Her dedication and willingness to be jailed repeatedly and cruelly hosed down rang true. Many parents were against their children marching at first, but probably knew someone had to if it could not be them. I asked her how non-participants felt. She said that the white establishment threatened many nonparticipants. Of course, parents would also be running the risk of losing their jobs. I asked her why Birmingham was chosen out of all major hubs in the South, and what was the reason the movement erupted in Birmingham when it did. She said that it was the “most racist” and “most vicious” [2]. There had been so many bombings to incite fear and quell resistance. Crucially though, was the administration of Bull Connor. Since he had been Commissioner of Public Safety for six terms already, he was extremely popular and had administrative authority over the police and fire departments, schools, public health service and libraries. He infamously said that he’d be ready for the Freedom Riders who arrived in Birmingham in 1961, leaving the Riders viciously beaten and no Klansmen arrested. I was curious whether Dr. King voiced his feelings about the Black Power movement to the children organizing in black churches. For one thing, he believed it drew the wrong kind of attention to the black community, and that they were fighting the wrong battle. Remembering King, who reminded her of Moses, Rev. Webb said: “[he] said it wasn't about Black Power or White Power, it was about Green Power!” [2]. Later, I asked her to compare her group’s reason for maintaining a nonviolent strategy, and whether she believes it shares any similarities with that of Black Power. “[I]f we didn't change society lawfully and with love, not with violence, we would not have a better and brighter future for all people... always remember, our movement was a non-violent movement, not by what ever means necessary” [2]. Finally, I asked her what she believes are the biggest triumphs of the Children’s March. She said that one of the biggest triumphs was beating Bull Connor. An institution of white supremacy in one man. He had become so unpopular and looked so weak, partially because of these heroic children, and was forced out of office[2]. KahloCorrigan (talk) 16:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)KahloCorrigan[reply]

  • Hi KahloCorrigan! Are you asking if this content can be added to the article? If so, then the answer is unfortunately no in this situation since this wasn't published in a reliable source. This can be one of the most frustrating aspects of Wikipedia when it comes to sourcing, as personal interviews like this can't be used to source information unless it's published in a place that can be verified. This aspect of Wikipedia is so restrictive that there was actually a case where a notable writer wanted to change some of the basic information on his article (like correcting employment dates and college information type of stuff), but all of his edits were reverted because at that point in time the correct information had never been published anywhere. I wish I could remember the author's name, but the guy actually made a point to mention this information in an interview with a major publication just so the article could be corrected. It's just that hard for something to be considered a verifiable reliable source on here. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 04:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "About Us". Foot Soldier International. Retrieved 26 May 2016.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Webb, Rev. Gwendolyn Cook (23 May 2016). "Interview with Child Crusader Rev. Gwendolyn Cook Webb". Brooklyn: Elisa Buttafuoco. History Department of Baruch College. {{cite news}}: |format= requires |url= (help)

Wiki Education assignment: HIST 121 - U.S. History since 1877[edit]

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 February 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LBaugustana, Frivelyn, Augustana-student-editor (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Mmhcowboy, Ander0056.

— Assignment last updated by Public-historian-90 (talk) 13:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding new key person in movement[edit]

I am going to add a paragraph of James Bevel, and his background and significance to the "Children's Crusade" Augustana-student-editor (talk) 14:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding paragraph on key figure[edit]

Adding a paragraph on bull conner a major opposition leader to the march. Augustana-student-editor (talk) 14:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding another paragraph to event, and addressing spelling and grammar mistakes[edit]

In the event section I reworked some of it, adding better clarification points. spelling and grammar usage, and another paragraph to expand on the topic. Augustana-student-editor (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added some small improvements to aftermath section[edit]

Rephrased, and made some points more clear, and added a few sentences to outline it all. Overall just a few smaller edits. Augustana-student-editor (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding onto federal response[edit]

Reworking, and adding a few sentences for a clearer picture of the actual response by the government to the march, and fixed some minor grammar errors. Augustana-student-editor (talk) 14:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

aftermath[edit]

Kelly Ingram Park Frivelyn (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background[edit]

Made the sentence active voice and fixed the grammer. LBaugustana (talk) 00:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opposition (adding to a paragraph) Logan (minor)[edit][edit]

Added a very long sentence to a paragraph explaining why over a thousand children gathered at Sixteenth Street Baptist Church. LBaugustana (talk) 00:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opposition (Adding details, and rewriting) - Logan (Major)[edit]

Rewrote an entire paragraph and added new information that was left out that was relevant. LBaugustana (talk) 00:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor information added on bombing- Logan[edit]

Added the names of the victims of the church bombing and added who was responsible for the bombing and explained how everyone who was a part of the bombing was convicted. LBaugustana (talk) 00:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The March Event and early aftermath of the event - Logan (Major)[edit]

Explained why the children were walking the streets, how Dr. King did not approve of children being a part of the protest, and the aftermath in result of the marches. LBaugustana (talk) 00:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Minor) edit improved the grammer of the first paragraph by adding punctuations and clarity. -Logan[edit]

Improved grammar by adding punctuations and clarity LBaugustana (talk) 00:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor grammer and active voice edit - Logan[edit]

Rewrote a sentence fixing grammar and changing it to active voice. LBaugustana (talk) 00:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]