Talk:Chinese emperors family tree
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Who makes the decision on what gets published here? I would like to know. Please e-mail me at guoclan at yahoo dot com. Thank you. HIM Yao Sui, officially by China's history and China's Han-Chinese imperial succession, Emperor of China.
Can I publish true information in Wikipedia in my own family's dynasty page?
Zhou Dynasty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhou_Dynasty
There is a section called "See also"
See also
* Four occupations * Family tree of the Zhou Dynasty * Tomb of Marquis Yi of Zeng * Xia Shang Zhou Chronology Project
Where there is a link to "Family tree of the Zhou Dynasty" Which is what my website is all about. Can I put a link to that?
Chinese emperors family tree
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_tree_of_the_Zhou_Dynasty
Himyaosui (talk) 10:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Himyaosui - you need to read things like WP:RS and WP:OR to understand what we can write here in Wikipedia. Note that under no circumstances is "original research" allowed (see WP:OR). Rather than people emailing you - how about you click on the links and do some reading to find out for yourself what Wikipedia allows. Most of the policies of Wikipedia are listed in WP:LOP. There are a few so you might like to set aside a bit of time :-) Shot info (talk) 23:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Shot, I think that you missed the point and Enric Naval is not an authority on the postings that he deleted. Many of the postings in Wikipedia are violations of other people's copyright materials. Wikipedia essentially is an outlaw that should perhaps cease to exist.
I take the time to read Wikipedia for research purposes as many times other online encyclopedias are not satisfactory. Contributors to Wikipedia steal their information from other sources and publish it here. This is illegal. Then, too, there are people publishing opinions and no one deletes this information.
The main problem with Wikipedia is that the moderators remain anonymous and unknown to prevent them from being sued.
If you ask any of them who they are or for their credentials they will not reply. It seems as if Wikipedia is a rogue organization.
Are you an authority source? WP:RS and OR have been considered by me in my additions to Wikipedia and yet my additions were deleted, because someone did not like them and thought that this was false information. It had nothing to do with WP:RS and OR.