This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
From the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Champappilly, I've trimmed down all the excessive research taken solely from Champappilly's works and merged all five subarticles to this page. For content reference, the histories of each page can be checked in the above "Copied from" template. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As such, even whatever content I've left behind still warrants as a closely-paraphrased possible copyright issue. It still needs to be replaced with better sources and rewritten. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]