Talk:Christopher Newton (criminal)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

Do all criminals executed in the United States pass the notability criteria?--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 20:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not, but this guy does --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 12:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are some jackasses on here who will write about any lowlife murderer just to give them a little bit of fame that they quite frankly don't deserve. This guy was brutal killer and no one should really give a fuck about the method of execution. He sure didn't care about how he murdered his cellmate.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.167.254 (talk • contribs)

I don't condone his actions, but he passes WP:BIO so a page is not out of the question for him. --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 13:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe some explanation of why you think he is notable is in order here. We've all seen bios of people who have actually accomplished something nominated for deletion. Aspenocean 14:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he meets the first criteria for WP:BIO, as there are 3 sources listed on his page linking to articles about him. I'm sure by doing a WP:GOOGLE test, would provide more reliable sources as well. I understand that on WP:BIO it states that just because someone passes one of the criteria, it doesn't necessarily mean they are notable enough to get a Wiki entry. However, it also doesn't state that passing one criteria is NOT grounds for notability. Basically, it's a toss up. It can go either way. So, if you believe he is not notable, then nomintate him for deletion. Personally, I'm neutral on the subject, and don't care one way or the other. Just simply putting in my thoughts. Have a good day. --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 18:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The notability of his execution often has to do with the total time it took, 2 hours. Though, the total time from the chemicals beginning to flow to death was only about 7 minutes. Most of the 2 hours was spent attempting trying to find a suitable insertion point.

Excerpt from the "Time line of execution": "11:37 a.m.: Signal given for chemicals to begin flowing. 11:39 a.m.: Newton's eyes close. 11:40 a.m.: Newton's belly begins to heave, his chin and face shudder and twitch, and his body twice mildly convulses on the table within his restraints. 11:45 a.m.: Movements stop. 11:51 a.m.: Curtain between witnesses and death chamber is pulled for coroner examination. 11:53 a.m.: Newton declared dead. " —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.198.232 (talk) 18:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the photo essay by Joseph Harris is a dead link. Someone might remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.126.71 (talk) 08:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is something wrong with the last paragraph. It starts "The controversy surrounding Newton's execution was primarily attributed to..." What controversy? I came upon this article out of the blue and I don't know what the writer is talking about. He (or she?) seems to have some personal point of view. I think this paragraph should be re-written.SylviaStanley (talk) 17:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC) I was unable to access four out of five references for this article. I have added one myself.SylviaStanley (talk) 18:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christopher Newton (criminal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]