Talk:Chronicles: Volume One

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Maybe somebody should find out when the next book is coming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.162.7.174 (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi!i think 'chronicles vol 1' is the first book ever to come out as 'vol 1' before the others ever existed! e.g. 'back to the future 1' was just called 'back to the future' until the second and third episodes came out. would you be able to confirm this?


The cover of the book says Vol. 1, so I think we should just keep it the way it is. Regardless if vol. 2 or 3 ever come out. -Vladimir Lenin 20:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The cover of the book says, "Volume One". Why has it's title been abbreviated? This needs to be changed. Thanks Educated Guest (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed at last. (thanks to RHaworth) Mick gold (talk) 08:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In music it's not unheard of to use a "Volume 1" designation without having a Volume 2 ready to go. The Honeydrippers' only EP was The Honeydrippers: Volume One, but Robert Plant never released anything else under the Honeydrippers name, much less a Volume Two. George Michael released Listen Without Prejudice Vol. 1 in 1990, and even though he lived more than 25 years after that and released three more albums, he never released a Listen Without Prejudice Vol. 2, in part due to a dispute with Sony Records. And to take an example where Bob Dylan was personally involved, the Traveling Wilburys' first album was titled Traveling Wilburys Vol. 1. Unlike the former two acts, the Wilburys did keep up the volume numbering with their next album ... although they titled it Traveling Wilburys Vol. 3. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bob Dylan Chronicles, Volume 1.jpg[edit]

Image:Bob Dylan Chronicles, Volume 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Writing 3225G 2023[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 January 2023 and 10 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jgreenbaum44 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jgreenbaum44 (talk) 00:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]