Talk:Cilevirus

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cilevirus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Copyvio[edit]

The copyright violation reported by the bot seems - to me anyway - to be a false positive. Firstly I had not read the article before the bot reported. I have now read the entire article and I dont see the violation - but maybe I am missing something. The phrases in the article are pretty standard - RNA, genome, segment, protein, poly adenosine tails etc - and I could potentially see how this might trigger a false positive. There is very little material on this virus and it would not be a major surprise if many of the same words occur on this page and the referred to article. The article itself is considerably longer than the current WP entry so if there is any overlap which has accidentally occurred then an violation would surely be 'de minimis'.DrMicro (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page has now been reviewed by >50 editors. No changes have been made to date. This seems to suggest that the bot may have perhaps over called the copyright violation. For this reason I have removed the notice.DrMicro (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The lack of sources has been alleviated, the article has been expanded and copyright shouldn't be a problem Bervin61 (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]