Talk:Cinema of Spain/Archives/2019
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cinema of Spain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120702052852/http://www.subtitledonline.com/special-features/top-10-films-in-spanish-cinema to http://www.subtitledonline.com/special-features/top-10-films-in-spanish-cinema
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Wikipedians!
Article Evaluation
Spanish Cinema
Content: The information in the article is up to date and relevant with the topic. The content takes an objective stance and there is a clear structure of the article. Each section of the article is clearly labelled with a title pertaining to its information. There are a good portion of references as well, but I didn't see any citations within the article. However, the article goes in depth with the history of Spanish Cinema including the Civil War, silent cinema, and cinema of the democratic era.
Tone: There are no instances where I detected bias in this article. It is a neutral, factual article that is very informative of Cinema in Spain. No viewpoints go unrepresented since there is a section talking about English-language Spanish films. It appears the editor did their research and considered all viewpoints.
Sources: The links of the references work, but a few of them bring me to the same website homepage and no information. The references take statistical information from the sources and support the information in the article. The only problem with this article is that there are no citations directly after sentences or paragraphs. All of the references are at the end of the article and nowhere else. The information comes from credible sources that have the same level of neutrality as the Wikipedia article.
Checking the talk page: There is one person on the talk page of this article. All they did was modify one external link in the article. The article is rated C-class and it is a part of two WikiProjects: WikiProject Film and WikiProject Spain. Wikipedia discusses the topic not that differently than the way we do in class. The Wikipedians are civil and helpful and provide edit summaries. The user also suggested to others to fix any issues if they were experiencing trouble with the article. Since there is not much conversation on this page, it's difficult to say how it's different than what we've learned in class.
Lastly, my question is:
Why didn't the editor cite sources within the article?